People

Five Structures for Becoming an Outstanding Executive Leader

There are a number of widely accepted frameworks that can assist you in becoming an effective executive leader rather than merely an executive leader.

Read More: Bardya Ziaian

Here, let’s examine a few of the frameworks.

1. The Effective Communication Framework (P-A-M)

Effective communication techniques may be cultivated with the use of the P-A-M framework. You may upskill yourself and use this framework in your everyday operations and team meetings.

Purpose, Audience, and Message are referred to as PAM. The reason for the message is called the purpose. It provides an answer to the query, “What do I hope my message will accomplish?” The group or person for whom the message is intended is referred to as the audience. It provides a response to the query, “Who am I speaking to?” Last but not least, the message is the information or material being conveyed. It provides a response to the query, “What am I attempting to express?”

2. The Three Foundations of Self-Belief

Build on these three pillars—self-expression, self-trust, and self-awareness—to increase your self-confidence. You may become more self-aware by conducting a SWOT analysis of yourself. Determine what makes you unique, what you need to work on, what possibilities are available to you, and, lastly, what outside influences could cause problems.

Gaining self-confidence comes from reaching objectives. Assume the role of a sales executive with the annual goal of selling 200 goods. It seems doable when you break it down to 16 sales a month and then to 1 sale in two days. It will boost your confidence and self-esteem even if you make your first transaction in three days rather than two.

The capacity to freely communicate your thoughts and opinions is known as self-expression. Let’s now imagine that you are required to present your product to a group of 300 people. First, visualize how you would feel after doing it successfully. Next, use constructive self-talk to motivate oneself.

3. The Four Delegation Quadrants

Use the two-step paradigm of Task Importance/Urgency and Individual Readiness to maintain the effectiveness of your delegation.

Consider the four quadrants shown in the above diagram. (Q1): Less urgent or significant tasks and a person’s lack of motivation to do them. In these situations, assign the work while keeping an eye on performance. (Q2): High work intent and less critical/urgent duties. Under such circumstances, assign the assignment and let the person to make judgments with little oversight.

(Q3): Extremely important/urgent assignment with a high level of work intent. In this case, assign the work with appropriate instructions and due dates, and keep an eye on the results. High importance/urgent tasks and poor work willingness are seen in the final quadrant (Q4). Don’t assign the assignment under these situations since the quality of the work may suffer from a lack of willingness.

4. The Five-Step Risk Management Framework

Use the five-step risk management framework to instill the ability to take measured risks. This is a summary of the same.

Risk identification involves conducting interviews, reviewing paperwork, brainstorming ideas, and analyzing historical data. This will assist in compiling a thorough list of hazards that have been discovered, including with information about their possible effects, chance of occurrence, and descriptions.

Risk measurement is the process of giving hazards qualitative or quantitative ratings based on their likelihood of occurring and possible outcomes. Make a matrix with high, medium, and low-risk categories based on it.

Risk Mitigation: Create a strategy detailing the precise steps and actions that must be followed in order to manage or reduce each risk that has been identified. Risk reduction, risk transfer, or risk acceptance are all examples of mitigation.

Risk Reporting: Inform stakeholders on a regular basis on the state of risks that have been identified, modifications to the risk environment, and the advancement of risk mitigation initiatives.

Establish rules and procedures, specify the roles and responsibilities of those engaged in risk management, and make sure that risk management is included into the organization’s broader governance framework.

5. The Critical Thinking Model of Paul-Elder

You may improve your thinkable abilities by using the global Paul-Elder Model of critical thinking.

There are three components to this concept. The ability to reason or think critically, which is derived from intellectual standards like precision, clarity, and logic. These two components give birth to the third one, which is intellectual traits like confidence, empathy, and persuasiveness, when ideas are formed using intellectual criteria.

Let’s look at an example to better grasp this. Imagine that you need to motivate your tech staff to develop a new AI by holding a learning program for them. First and foremost, you need to consider whether the new AI is necessary for the business, whether it will increase team productivity, and whether this is the best way to address the issue at hand. You must now do study to obtain precise information and more clarity in order to respond to these questions. You may confidently and persuasively convey your views if you have a clear understanding of your main arguments.